Days Postings
November 2024 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Blog Series
Copyright Notice
© Mark Biegert and Math Encounters, 2024. Publication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Mark Biegert and Math Encounters with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Disclaimer
All content provided on the mathscinotes.com blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner of mathscinotes.com will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.
Category Archives: Telephones
New Zealand Complex Phone Line Impedance
I received an email today asking me about the phone line impedance differences between New Zealand (Figure 1) and Australia. This is an easy question to answer, and I wrote up a quick Mathcad worksheet to perform the calculation. Continue reading
Posted in Electronics, Telephones
1 Comment
Why Positive Ground in Telcom Power Systems?
Today, we use wires with excellent insulation and these moisture-induced corrosion arguments carry less weight. Back in the old days, however, telecom wiring had cloth-based insulation that would get wet – along with the copper wire. When you mix water and electric fields, you get electrochemical action (i.e. electroplating). While the early systems were configured with negative grounds (i.e. ground as the lowest potential in the system), it was soon discovered that these systems suffered from corrosion. Positive ground (i.e. ground is the highest potential in the system) voltages were found to be effective in combating this corrosion. Continue reading
Posted in Electronics, Telephones
4 Comments
Estimating the RMS Ring Voltage at a Telephone
Introduction I just saw a customer report of phone ringing issues with an old 2500 series phone (Figure 1). While these are good phones, they can be difficult for Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) deployments because they have 1 Ringer Equivalence Number (REN) … Continue reading
Posted in Electronics, Telephones
Comments Off on Estimating the RMS Ring Voltage at a Telephone
Maximum Phone Line Length Math
I can see the days of the classic copper phone line coming to an end over the next few decades. Like analog video, it will eventually be replaced by digital services. For a fiber optic deployment (i.e. no copper), the old phones lines can re-purposed to carry the power needed by the fiber optic interface if AC power is not available. To carry power, the resistance of the line -- which is determined by the length and cross-sectional area of the line -- becomes very important. When carrying voice signals, phone line resistance was limited to ensure that the central office could detect the phone going off-hook. This post will use the maximum allowed line resistance to determine the maximum possible line length. Continue reading
Posted in Electronics, Telephones
9 Comments
Telephone Ring Trip Math
As you can tell by my recent posts, I am doing quite a bit of traditional landline phone math lately. The problems are not very complex, but their resolution is important to delivering quality voice service. Today, I have been working on the circuitry that determines when a phone has gone off-hook. Continue reading
Posted in Electronics, Telephones
5 Comments
Phone Line Impedance Levels: 600 Ohms and 900 Ohms
Engineering is a pretty conservative profession -- I have been accused of "abhorring change". Once something gets standardized it stays in place even when it does not make sense. This morning provided me a good example of this. Phone lines in the United States are usually characterized as having a characteristic impedance of 600 Ω or 900 Ω. These impedance levels go back to the early days of telephony (Figure 1). However, all the phone cables we work with are Category 3 and therefore have identical characteristic impedance (~725 Ω). So why the different impedance levels? I had a discussion with one of our telephony engineers about it this morning and all we could do is speculate. I thought I would document this speculation here. Continue reading
Posted in Electronics, Telephones
6 Comments